Is Police accountability a special case, or merely one example of the Essay

Is Police accountability a special case, or merely virtuoso example of the tension inherent in all accountability arrangements between allowing agents the exercise o - move ExampleThe OSCE in its report on democracy in Serbia says that to establish antiauthoritarian stability in a country it is crucial that the policing is both democratic and free from political interference (OSCE, 2002). For this purpose, accountability is prerequisite both within and outside the organization. This is to ensure that the natural law do not function in an authoritarian manner and can be held to account by the citizens for its actions. The report says that the most important feature of democratic policing is that policing must be with the general consent of the human beings (OSCE, 1). This applies both to the actions of the natural law personnel and the manner in which the action occurs. There must be an ongoing dialogue between the public and the jurisprudence regarding the sprint of policing and the limitations of guard powers (OSCE, 1). It implies an agreed understanding between the two about when the police will intervene and the agreeable ways for them to do it. It is known as moral consensus.In this system there is a counterpoise between power and accountability. Power is given(p) to the police forces by the parliament on behalf of the citizens, who are granted the ability to hold the police accountable for their actions, policies, procedures, priorities, and expenditure (OSCE 2002). The police is also expected to have integrity, fairness, sensitivity, and these set are upheld through systems of accountability. In a democracy, policing unavoidably to be based on consent across the community (Accountability I). The community recognizes the legitimacy of the policing task, confers authority on police personnel in carrying out their billet in policing and actively supports them (Accountability I). Consent depends on proper accountability. The police needs to be accountable in two senses - the subordinate or obedient sense and the explanatory and cooperative sense. In the former sense, the police are subordinate to the law and the community expects to get the service for which its money is spent. In the latter sense, the public and police need to communicate with each other and work in partnership to ensure legal policing. OSCE has recommended five directs of supervision to ensure accountability of the police forces to the public. These are 1. Internal affairs The first level of accountability insists on integrity. There is the need for an internal affairs department which overlooks the integrity of the individual police staff. Its responsibility will be to investigate allegations of crime, corruption and inappropriate behaviour on the part of the police personnel. They would also devise tactics to prevent corruption. 2. External oversight To uphold the integrity of this internal affairs department there needs to be an organization, comp letely independent of the police, which will oversee the allegations of crime, corruption and malpractices against the police. This external organization would also have the right to see the documents of the internal affairs department. This organization would report jeopardize to the public after investigating allegations against the police department. It will also be able to influence police procedures and comment publicly on incidents (OSCE 2002).3. Parliamentary oversight The external oversight organization also needs